Top 3 FUJIFILM X-H2S Alternatives In 2024

November 14, 2023 Posted by By Salik Waquas
Top 3 FUJIFILM X-H2S Alternatives

Drawing from my own hands-on experience with various cameras, I can attest that the FUJIFILM X-H2S has created quite a buzz among photographers and videographers, largely due to its outstanding capabilities. Yet, I’ve learned that no single camera is a one-size-fits-all solution, as every creator’s needs and preferences can vary. From my time spent exploring and testing various models, I’ve come across several cameras that can go toe-to-toe with the FUJIFILM X-H2S, or even surpass it in certain aspects. In this article, we will explore the top 3 FUJIFILM X-H2S alternatives that are worth considering for anyone looking for a high-quality camera that can deliver excellent results for their content creation needs.

1. Canon EOS R6 Mark II

If you are looking for a high-end mirrorless camera that can handle both stills and video, you might be interested in the Canon EOS R6 Mark II as a good alternative for FUJIFILM X-H2S. Both cameras are amazing hybrids, but they have some differences that may affect your decision. 

  1. Sensor- Full frame or APSC: The FUJIFILM X-H2S has a 26.2MP APS-C sensor, while the Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a 24.2MP full-frame sensor. This means that the Canon has a larger sensor area and a higher pixel density, which can result in better image quality, especially in low-light situations. The Canon also has a wider dynamic range and supports lossless compressed raw files, which can give you more flexibility in post-processing. However, the FUJIFILM has a stacked CMOS sensor, which reduces rolling shutter distortion and enables faster readout speeds.
  2. Autofocus and Lens Mount: Both cameras have fast and accurate autofocus systems, with 4897 focus points on the Canon EOS R6 Mark II and 425 on the FUJIFILM. They also have advanced subject tracking modes, such as face and eye detection, and animal recognition. The Canon uses the RF mount, which is compatible with a variety of high-quality lenses, including some with built-in image stabilization. The FUJIFILM uses the X mount, which also has a wide range of lenses, but some of them may not be as fast or sharp as the RF lenses.
  3. Design- Dimension and Weight Comparison: The FUJIFILM X-H2S is slightly smaller and lighter than the Canon EOS R6 Mark II, with a body volume of 1071.23 cm³ and a weight of 0.67 kg, compared to 1190.11 cm³ and 0.68 kg for the Canon. Both cameras have weather-sealed magnesium alloy bodies, with a comfortable grip and a hot shoe. They also have customizable buttons and command dials, but the FUJIFILM has more of them, as well as a top-panel OLED display that shows the shooting settings.
  4. Viewfinder and LCD monitor: Both cameras have electronic viewfinders (EVFs) and fully-articulated LCD monitors, which are useful for composing shots from different angles and reviewing images. The FUJIFILM has a higher-resolution EVF, with 5.76 million dots and a magnification of 0.8x, while the Canon has 3.69 million dots and a magnification of 0.76x. The Canon has a slightly larger LCD monitor, with a 3-inch diagonal and 1.62 million dots, while the FUJIFILM has a 2.95-inch diagonal and 1.62 million dots. Both screens are touch-sensitive and have a similar brightness level.
  5. Battery life: The Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a longer battery life than the FUJIFILM X-H2S, with a CIPA rating of 510 shots per charge, compared to 420 shots for the FUJIFILM. Both cameras use rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, which can be charged via USB. The Canon also supports wireless charging, which can be convenient if you have a compatible charger.
  6. Video Capabilities: Both cameras have impressive video capabilities, with internal recording options up to 6.2K 30p on the FUJIFILM and 4K 120p on the Canon. They also support various codecs and formats, such as H.264, H.265, MOV, and MP4. The FUJIFILM has an advantage in terms of video bitrate, with a maximum of 720 Mbps, while the Canon has a maximum of 340 Mbps. The FUJIFILM also has internal Apple ProRes support, which can improve the video quality and workflow. Both cameras have image stabilization, but the FUJIFILM has a digital image stabilization mode and an IS mode boost, which can reduce camera shake further. However, the Canon has a phase-detection autofocus system for videos, which can be more reliable and smooth than the contrast-detection system of the FUJIFILM.
  7. Price (USD): The FUJIFILM X-H2S is slightly cheaper than the Canon EOS R6 Mark II, with a suggested retail price of $2,299 for the body only, and $2,999 for the kit with the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR lens. The Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a suggested retail price of $2,499 for the body only, and $2,799 for the kit with the RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM lens.

2. Panasonic Lumix G9 II

If you are looking for a high-end mirrorless camera that can handle both stills and video, you might be interested in the Panasonic Lumix G9 II as a good alternative for FUJIFILM X-H2S. Both cameras are amazing hybrids, but they have some differences that may affect your decision. 

  1. Sensor- Full frame or APSC: The FUJIFILM X-H2S has a 26.2MP APS-C sensor, while the Panasonic Lumix G9 II has a 20.3MP Four Thirds sensor. This means that the FUJIFILM has a larger sensor area and a higher pixel density, which can result in better image quality, especially in low-light situations. The FUJIFILM also has a stacked CMOS sensor, which reduces rolling shutter distortion and enables faster readout speeds. However, the Panasonic has a dual output gain sensor, which can improve the dynamic range and noise performance.
  2. Autofocus and Lens Mount: Both cameras have fast and accurate autofocus systems, with 779 focus points on the FUJIFILM and 225 on the Panasonic. They also have advanced subject tracking modes, such as face and eye detection, and animal recognition. The FUJIFILM uses the X mount, which is compatible with a variety of high-quality lenses, offering versatility to photographers. The Panasonic uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, which also has a wide range of lenses, but some of them may not be as fast or sharp as the X lenses.
  3. Design- Dimension and Weight Comparison: The Panasonic Lumix G9 II is slightly smaller and lighter than the FUJIFILM X-H2S, with a body volume of 1225.24 cm³ and a weight of 0.66 kg, compared to 1230.8 cm³ and 0.68 kg for the FUJIFILM. Both cameras have weather-sealed magnesium alloy bodies, with a comfortable grip and a hot shoe. They also have customizable buttons and command dials, but the Panasonic has more of them, as well as a top-panel OLED display that shows the shooting settings.
  4. Viewfinder and LCD monitor: Both cameras have electronic viewfinders (EVFs) and fully-articulated LCD monitors, which are useful for composing shots from different angles and reviewing images. The Panasonic has a higher-resolution EVF, with 5.76 million dots and a magnification of 0.83x, while the FUJIFILM has 3.69 million dots and a magnification of 0.75x. The FUJIFILM has a slightly larger LCD monitor, with a 3-inch diagonal and 1.62 million dots, while the Panasonic has a 2.95-inch diagonal and 1.84 million dots. Both screens are touch-sensitive and have a similar brightness level.
  5. Battery life: The FUJIFILM X-H2S has a longer battery life than the Panasonic Lumix G9 II, with a CIPA rating of 580 shots per charge, compared to 400 shots for the Panasonic. Both cameras use rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, which can be charged via USB. The FUJIFILM also supports wireless charging, which can be convenient if you have a compatible charger.
  6. Video Capabilities: Both cameras have impressive video capabilities, with internal recording options up to 6.2K 30p on the FUJIFILM and 4K 120p on the Panasonic. They also support various codecs and formats, such as H.264, H.265, MOV, and MP4. The FUJIFILM has an advantage in terms of video bitrate, with a maximum of 720 Mbps, while the Panasonic has a maximum of 300 Mbps. The FUJIFILM also has internal Apple ProRes support, which can improve the video quality and workflow. Both cameras have image stabilization, but the Panasonic has a digital image stabilization mode and an IS mode boost, which can reduce camera shake further. However, the FUJIFILM has a phase-detection autofocus system for videos, which can be more reliable and smooth than the contrast-detection system of the Panasonic.
  7. Price (USD): The Panasonic Lumix G9 II is cheaper than the FUJIFILM X-H2S, with a suggested retail price of $1,899 for the body only, and $2,299 for the kit with the Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 12-60mm f/2.8-4 ASPH. POWER O.I.S. lens. The FUJIFILM X-H2S has a suggested retail price of $2,299 for the body only, and $2,999 for the kit with the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR lens.

3. Sony a7 IV

If you are looking for a high-end mirrorless camera that can handle both stills and video, you might be interested in the Sony a7 IV as a good alternative for the FUJIFILM X-H2S. 

  1. Sensor- Full frame or APSC: The Sony a7 IV has a 33MP full-frame sensor, while the FUJIFILM X-H2S has a 26.2MP APS-C sensor. This means that the Sony has a larger sensor area and a lower pixel density, which can result in better image quality, especially in low-light situations. The Sony also has a wider dynamic range and supports lossless compressed raw files, which can give you more flexibility in post-processing. However, the FUJIFILM has a stacked CMOS sensor, which reduces rolling shutter distortion and enables faster readout speeds.
  2. Autofocus and Lens Mount: Both cameras have fast and accurate autofocus systems, with 759 focus points on the Sony and 779 on the FUJIFILM. They also have advanced subject tracking modes, such as face and eye detection, and animal recognition. The Sony uses the E mount, which is compatible with a variety of high-quality lenses, including some with built-in image stabilization. The FUJIFILM uses the X mount, which also has a wide range of lenses, but some of them may not be as fast or sharp as the E lenses.
  3. Design- Dimension and Weight Comparison: The Sony a7 IV is slightly smaller and lighter than the FUJIFILM X-H2S, with a body volume of 1008.5 cm³ and a weight of 0.66 kg, compared to 1071.23 cm³ and 0.67 kg for the FUJIFILM. Both cameras have weather-sealed magnesium alloy bodies, with a comfortable grip and a hot shoe. They also have customizable buttons and command dials, but the Sony has more of them, as well as a top-panel OLED display that shows the shooting settings.
  4. Viewfinder and LCD monitor: Both cameras have electronic viewfinders (EVFs) and fully-articulated LCD monitors, which are useful for composing shots from different angles and reviewing images. The Sony has a lower-resolution EVF, with 3.69 million dots and a magnification of 0.78x, while the FUJIFILM has 5.76 million dots and a magnification of 0.8x. The Sony has a slightly larger LCD monitor, with a 3-inch diagonal and 1.62 million dots, while the FUJIFILM has a 2.95-inch diagonal and 1.62 million dots. Both screens are touch-sensitive and have a similar brightness level.
  5. Battery life: The Sony a7 IV has a longer battery life than the FUJIFILM X-H2S, with a CIPA rating of 510 shots per charge, compared to 420 shots for the FUJIFILM. Both cameras use rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, which can be charged via USB. The FUJIFILM also supports wireless charging, which can be convenient if you have a compatible charger.
  6. Video Capabilities: Both cameras have impressive video capabilities, with internal recording options up to 4K 60p on the Sony and 6.2K 30p on the FUJIFILM. They also support various codecs and formats, such as H.264, H.265, MOV, and MP4. The FUJIFILM has an advantage in terms of video bitrate, with a maximum of 720 Mbps, while the Sony has a maximum of 340 Mbps. The FUJIFILM also has internal Apple ProRes support, which can improve the video quality and workflow. Both cameras have image stabilization, but the FUJIFILM has a digital image stabilization mode and an IS mode boost, which can reduce camera shake further. However, the Sony has a phase-detection autofocus system for videos, which can be more reliable and smooth than the contrast-detection system of the FUJIFILM.
  7. Price (USD): The Sony a7 IV and the FUJIFILM X-H2S have similar prices, with a suggested retail price of $2,499 for the body only, and $2,799 for the kit with the 24-105mm lens for the Sony, and $2,299 for the body only, and $2,999 for the kit with the 16-55mm lens for the FUJIFILM.

Salik Waquas
View More Posts
Salik Waquas is a seasoned professional in the world of cinema, bringing over a decade of experience as a cinematographer and colorist. With an eye for capturing the perfect shot and a passion for enhancing the visual storytelling of films, he has made a significant mark in the industry. Aside from mastering the art of cinematography and color grading, Salik also enjoys sharing insights and knowledge through the written word. As a dedicated blogger in the film industry, His articles cover a wide range of film-related topics, offering readers a unique perspective and valuable insights into the world of cinema.